The Scandal of the Evangelical Mind by Mark Noll, originally published in 1994 by Wm. B. Eerdmans, now available in several formats, including audio. (If you follow the link and purchase the book I will receive a small commission at no additional cost to you.)
I am going to assume that you have already read or will read my review of this book over at my main site, Intentional Living. As I said there, this is a dense, challenging book that will reward readers who take it on.
For the purpose of this post, however, I want to concentrate specifically on some ideas that help explain why so many earnest, sincere Evangelical/ Fundamentalist Christians felt that they had to vote for a lying, cheating, adulterous playboy with a pro-choice Liberal Democratic background and a profane, vulgar vocabulary. Their votes reflected a failure of the mind in several different areas. I hope the following won’t sound too scathing, but we are in a predicament today that does not allow for mincing of words. America has elected an utterly unfit man to the Presidency, and Evangelicals helped to put him there. Why?
It has occurred to me often over the past year that there are a few terms that keep cropping up in political discussions and which are often used inaccurately, or at least sloppily. The terms have some overlap but are distinct ideas, and I think it’s helpful to parse them out. So here goes:
What does it mean to “be a Berean”? Take a look at Acts 17:11:
I get this comment sometimes on my Facebook page, so let’s address it. Are we really better off with Donald Trump than we would have been with Hillary Clinton? It’s not a matter of re-fighting the election but of taking a good, hard look at what (if anything) has actually been accomplished by the election of a third-rate celebrity con man with no governing experience to the highest office in the land. I will be including links at various places to articles I’ve already posted as support for my ideas.
Yet another post thoughtfully provided by a commenter on my Facebook page, this time in response to an article I posted about Donald Trump’s speech to Congress way, way last week. I’ve been pondering it and decided it was worth my further thoughts. Here’s what the commenter said:
After one of my dearest friends and most faithful readers wrote a long, thoughtful comment on my previous post I realized that I hadn’t been as clear as I should have been with my statement that we should go out and meet Muslims instead of reading books about them. As I said in my response to her comment, I should have worded that sentence a little differently. My point was that at some point you need to quit absorbing information and start putting what you have to use. Here are the sources of information I’ve absorbed over the past decade or so on this issue:
What are you afraid of? Do you really believe that the cause of Christ is so weak that it can be conquered by Islam?